| 
									   
									
									More 
									than half of China, lying beyond the Great 
									Wall, were added to China by conquests. And 
									all along its western border, 5000 miles 
									long, live the conquered peoples—Tibetans, 
									Manchus, Uighurs, Mongols and other—sullen 
									and rebellious. China has become a prison to 
									its minorities.  
									 
									It is said that a nation is judged by the 
									way it treats its minorities. This is 
									largely true. How does China stand up to 
									this test? Rather terribly. China is the 
									most oppressive nation to its minorities. 
									Can there be anything more terrible than 
									China’s determined efforts to obliterate the 
									identity of the minorities? At the same 
									time, it is the most chauvinistic about the 
									identity of its own people—the Hans—abroad.
									 
									 
									China has been attempting a “final solution” 
									by submerging the separate identity of the 
									conquered in a sea of the Han race through 
									colonisation, forced marriages and 
									destruction of the visible symbols of their 
									separate identity! And this by a state which 
									calls itself socialist!  
									 
									There are about 100 or so non-Han ethnic 
									groups in China. They number about 100 
									million or so. It is insignificant compared 
									to the Han race. By the way, they are 
									concentrated in three provinces—Tibet, 
									Sinkiang and Inner Mongolia. Take away these 
									three provinces, China will be reduced to a 
									small state with little of resources.  
									 
									China had two distinct lines on minorities—a 
									Marxist line and a Mao line. The Marxists 
									line—self-determination of nations—can be 
									traced to the 1920’s. But when Mao came to 
									lead the party, the attitude began to 
									change. Self-determination gave way to 
									autonomy and autonomy gave way to 
									assimilation. But during the 8th Congress of 
									the Chinese Communist Party under Liu Shao 
									Chin, the policy of “Great Han Chauvinism” 
									of Mao condemned and China went back to 
									self-determination. But it was Mao’s policy, 
									which prevailed at the end.  
									 
									Millions of Han people were moved to the 
									minority areas. Thus two Han regions were 
									added to Inner Mongolia in order to reduce 
									the proportion of the Mongols to 10 per 
									cent. Similarly, non-Han people were 
									deliberately scattered throughout China. Yet 
									another method adopted by China to destroy 
									the separate identity of the minorities was 
									by forcing marriages with the Han men. 
									Forcing the marriage of non-Han girls with 
									Han men, in turn, forced the minority men to 
									marry Han girls.  
									 
									Colonisation and other anti-minority 
									measures produced revolts among the 
									minorities. But these were brutally 
									suppressed. Beijing characterised them as 
									“class struggle.”  
									 
									From 1960s, the Maoists began to suppress 
									minority cultures. The Chinese media openly 
									asserted at this time that China had scope 
									only for one race—the Great Hans. One paper 
									called for “fusion” of races. Another said 
									that “assimilation” is a Marxist measure. It 
									said: “He who is opposed to assimilation is 
									opposed to socialism and communism”. After 
									such categoric assertions, there was little 
									revolt. That is why the world is surprised 
									over the continuing revolt in Tibet.  
									 
									During the “cultural revolution”, theatres, 
									music, literature, etc. of minorities were 
									abolished. They were not allowed 
									denominational schools of their own. The 
									medium of instruction was charged to Chinese 
									and the minority languages came to be 
									written in Chinese script.  
									 
									We hear of only Tibet these days, not much 
									of Sinkiang and inner Mongolia. This is 
									because the Tibetan exiles are all over the 
									world keeping up the problem alive. What is 
									more, the strategic location of Tibet has 
									attracted interference by America. American 
									strategists see that Sinkiang and Tibet 
									together can become a major base to dislodge 
									the communists from Beijing. This explains 
									why China refuses to come to terms with the 
									Dalai Lama.  
									 
									As for Sinkiang, the Muslim area, Hans 
									continue to pour into this region in order 
									to alter the population balance. Sinkiang is 
									rich in minerals. By the way it is also one 
									of the nuclear centres of China.  
									 
									Although little is known of Inner Mongolia, 
									it can cause considerable problems for China 
									if there is a demand from the two Mongolias 
									for unification. In view of China’s own 
									demand for unification of Taiwan, it will be 
									difficult for China to decline the demand.
									 
									 
									Like the Mongols, the Manchus too conquered 
									China and ruled over the country for 300 
									years. When the Manchus were ousted from 
									power by the Chinese nationalists, Manchuria 
									was annexed with China. Manchuria is the 
									richest province of China, which explains 
									why Japan tried to seize it during the 
									Second World War. The Manchus too have been 
									reduced to a minority in their own homeland.
									 
									 
									There are 10-12 million Muslims in China. 
									The fundamentalists are trying to wean away 
									the Muslim regions from China. It is true 
									that the task will be difficult, for China 
									has destroyed the life-support system, that 
									is the wakf boards and madrassas. Today even 
									the construction of a new mosque needs 
									permission from the local authorities.
									  |